I found this interesting article on CNN, that pure fruit juice supposedly does not "cause" children to become overweight.
There is something fishy going on there. Both pure juice and artificial juice-flavored drinks contain a lot of sugar. It shouldn't matter which kind of juice a person drinks.
My guess is that there is a selection effect going on: that parents of children who desire or can afford pure juice, are the ones that pay more attention to the total diets of their children, and thus prevent them from becoming overweight. The implication of the article is that we should "drink more juice" because it's good for us. But I suspect the reality is more simple than that... If you drink more sugary juice -- no matter what kind -- you will get more overweight!
I'm sure I could devise a study that could conclude that crack makes children more alert and active... but that does not mean that cocaine is "good for you."
The fact that the obvious question was not discussed, whether children who drank water instead of juice were healthier or not, suggests that the researchers came to the study with an agenda. I found it interesting that there is no sponsorship information about the study.
According the study, children who drank more pure juice ate less fat and other bad stuff. However, is that really a cause and effect relationship? Do children really desire to eat less fat because they drink "pure" juice? I doubt it. I think the two are correlated, but not causally related.
To be fair, the author of the study does say that parents should look at the "total number of calories that the child is taking in ... and ... the activity level of the child." Good points. I suspect that these two factors are the important ones, and the kind of juice is irrelevant. This "total calorie" information is buried in the last paragraph of the press release. It's just that a headline like, "Children Who Eat Fewer Calories and Exercise More are Healthier," is not very sexy for the industry.
There was another article about a week ago, "New Study Shows Citrus Juices Have the Highest Nutrient Content," which suggests to me that the Florida juice industry is engaging in a media campaign.
Updated (3:04pm): added cause and effect paragraph.
Updated (11 May): my friend CW corrects some of my erroneous assumptions (see comments).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Did the study mention anything about beer? Isn't beer good for you? It's like bread! In a glass! Where are the barley-groweres? I want to see them do a little campaign work, please.
For kids? You mean like "Flintstones Ale," and "Count Chocula Stout?"
You have some??
My friend CW (a health writer) writes:
... That's a fine working theory about parents who provide 100% juice vs. fruit drink. But I didn't think it was "contrary to popular belief," as the CNN article stated, that OJ leads to weight gain. In fact, I never heard of such a thing.
Fruit drinks contain corn syrup, which is glucose, or liquid blood sugar. This [messes] up the pancreas. Real juice contains fructose, in smaller amounts at that because it is sweeter molecule for molecule. Fructose has a much lower glycemic index compared to glucose and I think sucrose (cane sugar), which means it doesn't cause a spike in blood sugar, which is why diabetics can handle it.
The theory goes that corn syrup and other processed sugars are behind the obesity and diabetes epidemics because of their effect on the pancreas and metabolism. I can't believe the CNN article didn't mention any of this.
Pure juice has more calories than water but likely less than whole milk. Anyway, all calories aren't equal, which is why the WHO recommends a certain ratio of calories from carb, fat and protein.
-cw
From Consumer Reports a few years back (2/05, I think). Something to watch out for: juices marketed as "100% juice" but having unusual flavors (kiwi-strawberry, etc.) typically have white grape juice as their primary ingredient. The white grape juice base has been processed to remove much of its intrinsic flavor (and hence nutrients), but keep the sugar. So "100% juice" can be misleading.
This is some bullshit dude this isn't about crack at all.
Post a Comment